Press Archive

Juxtapoz - February 2016
American Art Collector - Feb 2016
Hi Fructose - January 2016
Tendencias - January 2016
Fine Art Connoisseur - Jan 2016
New York Times - May 16 2014
LA Weekly - May 08 2014
Interview - May 02 2014
BSC News - No 66, Feb 2014
Hi-Fructose - Vol 28, Sep 2013
Artension - July-Aug 2013
Le Monde Magazine - June 2013
Amsterdam Enjoy - June-July, 2012
Artravel No. 44 - March, 2012
La Repubblica XL - March, 2012
Elegy - April/May, 2012
Juxtapoz - December 2011
Laminate 3 - Aug 2011
Meatpaper - Mar 2011
Arte Dossier - Aug 2010
hDL Magazine - Aug 2010
Interview Magazine - May 2010
NYT Style Magazine - April 2010
Milk - April 2010
Tattoo - March 2010
Bizarre Magazine - June 2009
Bliss - September, 2008
200% - No. 3, Summer 2008
The District - July, 2008
Helio Magazine - Fall, 2007
Trace - No. 74, May, 2007
Juxtapoz - May 2007
LA CityBeat - Vol 5, March 15, 2007
dpi - Vol 94, February, 2007
La Repubblica XL - September, 2006
Hi-Fructose - Vol 3, July, 2006
Project - June 2006
Arte - March, 2006
Parteaguas - Spring, 2006
Parteaguas Special Ed. - Spring 2006
Umbigo - No. 16, 2006
Art Prostitute - No. 08, 2006
.ISM - Winter 2005
Creatie - November 2005
LA Weekly - October 17, 2005
The Creator Studio - October, 2005
Pacha Madrid - September, 2005
H - No. 66, September, 2005
Juxtapoz - April 2005
Bant - No. 14, 2005
Venice - April 2005
Flaunt - February 2005
idpure Magazine - January 2005
Versus - January/February 2004
Juxtapoz - Sept/Oct, 2003
Contemporary - No. 52, May, 2003
Elegy - April/May, 2002
Los Angeles Times - April 4, 2003
LA Weekly - April 17, 2003
Gothic & Lolita - February, 2003
Juxtapoz - January/February, 2002
LA Weekly - January 9, 2002
Los Angeles Times - Jan 4, 2002
Cyberzone - No. 15, 2002
New York Art World - Dec, 2001
New York Times - Nov 7, 2001
Oyster - October/November 2001
Black+White - October 2001
TEAR - September, 2001
Pure - Vol One, 2001
Communication Arts - May/June, 2001
Panik Magazine - November, 1998
Juxtapoz - Winter, 1998
Juxtapoz - Spring, 1995

Selected Press




Flaunt Magazine
February 2005

Upon initial viewing, every object or character in any one of Mark Ryden's paintings seems like it is in exactly the right place. After realizing that these things happen to be, for example, garlic, the green skeleton of a two-homed quadruped, and the Devil holding some raw meat, it's tempting to have second thoughts. But still, everything fits which usually leads to attempts to decipher what's going on, to figure out the exact meaning of every image: why it's there, what it's doing, what it's supposed to make us think, and where it comes from. Daunting as it is, this may prove an exceptionally monumental task when faced with Wondertoonel," a retrospective that mixes paintings from "Blood," "Bunnies & Bees," and "The Meat Show". Each of these series explores a different theme, but together, they retain a sense of visual consistency It's natural to try to figure it all out, of course.

People have been in the business of classifying and assigning names for a long time now It's one of the things we do best. And while we have much to be thankful for - encyclopedias, days of the week, verbal communication - plenty gets in the way creating a name for something is always a translation, and rarely is each and every detail brought across in the process. It's usually the ideas that seem to make perfect sense in your head that lose everything when put into words. This is usually the result of attempting to analyze what's going on in these pictures.

For art sleuths bent on decoding the true cryptic messages of his work, "historical, personal, and whatever" are a few categories that Mark Ryden offers for the origin of his images. If that doesn't help, then consider how first impressions may be the right ones: each of those things are in there because they're supposed to be, because the painting wouldn't look right without them. There's an overwhelming sense of appropriateness of placement in Ryden's paintings. Every element, from the size of the painting (often very very small) to the way it is painted (slowly) to the place where it is seen (in a museum, obviously though Ryden imagines that maybe a more ornate, church-like setting might also be fitting) is important.

The truth is, "historical, personal, and whatever" describes perfectly what goes on in any of Ryden's paintings, although any other number of explanations would work, too. That's because the world they depict is not a foreign one, really (they're full of familiar images), but their precise source is a place as hard to pin down as anything else. You could call it anima mundi, zeitgeist, some kind of collective consciousness, the wide world of "art," or "whatever," but these are just approximations. They come from the same wellspring as religious icons, pop icons, comic books, cartoons, encyclopedia illustrations-but they are also direct representations of these things. Chances are that everything that appears in the art is something you've seen somewhere before, or at least feel like you have. The stumbling block is trying to articulate what ties them together, if you're unsatisfied by the fact that they are all just things to look at: bunnies, skulls, Abraham Lincolns. Undeniably these are aesthetically appealing objects. And that's it. Right?

No, not quite. There are distinct moods that accompany the first reaction, which is often aided by the painting's size. The small ones are the bloody ones, miniature to keep the gore in the realm of personal pain, to minimize the horror-movie screaming, yelling connotations, and to remain more introspective. Blood is, after d , designed to draw your attention immediately.

"If you see it, there's probably something to be concerned about," Ryden says. Keeping these paintings small calls that funny fluid's less disastrous qualities to mind-even if you're looking at a picture of a young girl bleeding from her eyes. Not all of Ryden's paintings are small. The size of each reflects its content.

"When I think of an image," he says, "it is supposed to be a certain size." Ryden has been working on his largest painting yet, and it's a wildly different creature than the saucer-sized "Blood" portraits, though he is painting it with the same meticulous attention to detail as he does his tiny pictures. In spite of its size, chances are it won't be screaming bloody murder- Ryden's paintings always seem to speak calmly, even though they speak about astonishing things.