Press Archive

Juxtapoz - February 2016
American Art Collector - Feb 2016
Hi Fructose - January 2016
Tendencias - January 2016
Fine Art Connoisseur - Jan 2016
New York Times - May 16 2014
LA Weekly - May 08 2014
Interview - May 02 2014
BSC News - No 66, Feb 2014
Hi-Fructose - Vol 28, Sep 2013
Artension - July-Aug 2013
Le Monde Magazine - June 2013
Amsterdam Enjoy - June-July, 2012
Artravel No. 44 - March, 2012
La Repubblica XL - March, 2012
Elegy - April/May, 2012
Juxtapoz - December 2011
Laminate 3 - Aug 2011
Meatpaper - Mar 2011
Arte Dossier - Aug 2010
hDL Magazine - Aug 2010
Interview Magazine - May 2010
NYT Style Magazine - April 2010
Milk - April 2010
Tattoo - March 2010
Bizarre Magazine - June 2009
Bliss - September, 2008
200% - No. 3, Summer 2008
The District - July, 2008
Helio Magazine - Fall, 2007
Trace - No. 74, May, 2007
Juxtapoz - May 2007
LA CityBeat - Vol 5, March 15, 2007
dpi - Vol 94, February, 2007
La Repubblica XL - September, 2006
Hi-Fructose - Vol 3, July, 2006
Project - June 2006
Arte - March, 2006
Parteaguas - Spring, 2006
Parteaguas Special Ed. - Spring 2006
Umbigo - No. 16, 2006
Art Prostitute - No. 08, 2006
.ISM - Winter 2005
Creatie - November 2005
LA Weekly - October 17, 2005
The Creator Studio - October, 2005
Pacha Madrid - September, 2005
H - No. 66, September, 2005
Juxtapoz - April 2005
Bant - No. 14, 2005
Venice - April 2005
Flaunt - February 2005
idpure Magazine - January 2005
Versus - January/February 2004
Juxtapoz - Sept/Oct, 2003
Contemporary - No. 52, May, 2003
Elegy - April/May, 2002
Los Angeles Times - April 4, 2003
LA Weekly - April 17, 2003
Gothic & Lolita - February, 2003
Juxtapoz - January/February, 2002
LA Weekly - January 9, 2002
Los Angeles Times - Jan 4, 2002
Cyberzone - No. 15, 2002
New York Art World - Dec, 2001
New York Times - Nov 7, 2001
Oyster - October/November 2001
Black+White - October 2001
TEAR - September, 2001
Pure - Vol One, 2001
Communication Arts - May/June, 2001
Panik Magazine - November, 1998
Juxtapoz - Winter, 1998
Juxtapoz - Spring, 1995

Selected Press




Mark Ryden

Trace Magazine
Natural Mystic
Mark Ryden Looks to the Trees For His Latest Exhibition
May, 2007
By Steven Psyllos
photo: John Dragonette
There is such detail in Mark Ryden's work that the viewer is mesmerized for long moments absorbing all that the artist has placed there before him. It's almost overwhelming, to be honest. And it is not just the artist's mastery of his craft that will lull the viewer into these dream-like states, it is quite often the subject matter; Ryden portrays the space between what is and what can be, between what we call reality and what is just beyond. Mark Ryden fathered the West Coast style once known as Lowbrow, now called Pop-Surrealism. But the jacket never quite fit the artist and has neglected to capture all that Ryden is capable of. The old guard in the art market has always shied away from popular forms of artwork, thinking they might fail to stand the test of time. But the critics have certainly zipped their lips and accepted Ryden as the work itself progressively reveals greater depths of this artist's vision. It is as if we are watching a contemporary genius flourish before our eyes, as he manipulates the mundane canvas into something sacred. Ryden's latest exhibit "The Tree Show" opened at the Michael Kohn Galley in Los Angeles.

How did this latest series come into being? Well, it just started to happen, I felt myself being pulled towards trees, and more specifically California trees, the Sequoias. There are so many different aspects to the subject of trees but initially I was interested in how trees have had such a prominent place in religion, mythology, and are truly connected with our human history. Trees are living extensions of the world's soul.

They are almost ancient, mythical entities living amongst us. I was interested in the paradox of how these giant Sequoias inspire spiritual awe in some people, while other people just want to chop 'em down and cut 'em up. [Laughter.]

Describe the creative process that led up to this latest exhibit. For "The Tree Show," I acquired so many books on trees and tree mythology and folklore. Usually, I fill up my head with information and then I start to sketch. I have piles and piles of drawings, quick little ideas on paper. Slowly, I pick Mark Ryden, Allegory of the Four Elements, 2006. Oil on canvas, 13" x 20". Courtesy of Michael Kohn Gallery. some of them to take further. Often, it's hard to decide because I know I can only do a certain number of paintings because it takes so long to execute them. Once I start, I draw out as much of it as I can without locking myself into one set composition, and I try to get to actually painting. Then it's a long process, which slows down as you go along. At first, things change very dramatically within a few days, but the steps you take later on are hardly visible but very important.

How close to your initial idea does the final work come? Well, I usually see something that will spark an idea, and usually the idea is pretty complete, but kinda blurry, the details are not real clear. So, I try to discover what the details are supposed to be. It feels to me that there is a "right" answer, like the painting already exists and I'm Just there to figure it out. There does seem to be this "right or wrong" definitive answer to a lot of the details.

Sounds like part of your work is channeling from the subject matter. Do you feel like you're tapping into something larger when creating? I think you really have to let go of your ego and realize that it's not you yourself making this, it's something much bigger and you have to let go of feeling responsible for it.

You present these worlds as if through the eyes of one of your subjects, which are often little children. Why is childhood so attractive to you, and how does it relate to your work? That's the time when we develop the picture of what the world is. That's where the archetype of everything is formed. Many times, the images in children's books are the first time we see certain things.

How would you describe your style? I think it's good for an artist not to think about that and analyze that because that's when you become very self- conscious and you freeze up your ability to create things.

But isn't it also dangerous to allow another person for another to define it? But that's what people love to do. They love to put stuff in categories, in its place in society or in history.

Sad, isn't it?